Welcome to The Alabama Baptist

Other related sites for The Alabama Baptist

This option may be turned off in your profile page. If you are having
trouble with the link, make sure your pop-up blocker is turned off.




forgot password


Court strikes down clergy tax break claiming it violates separation of church, statecomment (0)

December 5, 2013

Court strikes down clergy tax break claiming it violates separation of church, state

A federal judge said Nov. 23 that an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rule allowing clergy to avoid paying taxes on a part of their income designated as a housing allowance violates the constitutionally mandated separation of church and state.

Senior United States District Judge Barbara Crabb said a section of the tax code granting a benefit for “ministers of the gospel” not available to everyone else favors religion over nonreligion, thus creating an establishment of religion prohibited by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Crabb, appointed by President Jimmy Carter to the U.S. District Court for Western Wisconsin, ordered her ruling to take effect after the conclusion of any appeal. That means what GuideStone Financial Resources calls “the most important tax benefit available to ministers” is safe for now.

Leaders at GuideStone — the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) agency that offers retirement, insurance, investment management and other financial services to the Southern Baptist and wider evangelical Christian communities — plan to join others in a legal brief supporting the ministerial housing allowance when the case goes to appeal.

“Although this particular case does not have immediate impact, we know that pastors and others in ministry are facing challenges in our very own nation as never before,” GuideStone President O.S. Hawkins said in a statement.

“This decision, while not unanticipated, is sadly symptomatic of our culture today,” Hawkins said. “We count it a privilege to be an advocate for those who have given their lives to ministry, and we will not forsake our mission to undergird those who so faithfully serve our churches and ministries.”

Russell Moore, president of the SBC Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), stood beside Hawkins in statements posted on the ERLC website.

“The clergy housing allowance isn’t a government establishment of religion, but just the reverse,” Moore said. “The allowance is neutral to all religions. Without it, clergy in small congregations of all sorts would be penalized and harmed.”

The so-called “parsonage allowance” dates back to 1921, when most churches maintained a parsonage near the church where the minister and his family lived rent-free. The IRS allowed ministers to exclude such in-kind compensation from federal taxes.

In 1954, Congress extended the law to cash allowances, as more and more ministers were moving out of parsonages to rent or purchase their own homes.

Over the years challenges have arisen, including a high-profile case in 1996 when “The Purpose Driven Life” author and Southern Baptist megachurch pastor Rick Warren deducted his entire $77,663 salary from Saddleback Church, Lake Forest, Calif., as housing allowance. The IRS ordered Warren to pay back taxes on a portion of his income.

Warren spent four years in court defending his housing deduction and won in 2000, when a court struck down the IRS argument capping the deduction at a “reasonable” amount and accepted Warren’s argument that the amount could be unlimited.

The IRS filed an appeal, but before it made it to a three-judge panel, Congress swiftly passed the 2002 Clergy Housing Allowance Clarification Act to protect the parish exemption but limit it to the fair market rental value of a home.

Several challenges to the benefit have failed. Courts have ruled that nonministers suing for a benefit available only to clergy cannot possibly prevail, and the only result would be to deny it to those who qualify.

The current case, filed in September 2011 by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, cleared that hurdle by designating a portion of employee compensation as a housing allowance. Two employees in turn sued the federal government, claiming that denying them a benefit available to ministers violates the Establishment Clause and gives the IRS and Treasury Department authority to make “sensitive, fact-intensive and subjective determinations” on religious matters such as whether an individual is “duly ordained.”

The IRS has interpreted the exemption broadly, taking “ministers of the gospel” to mean not only those who preach from the New Testament, but also applying to thousands of ministers, priests, rabbis, imams and other faith leaders.

In her 43-page ruling, however, Crabb said because a minister’s primary function “is to disseminate a religious message, a tax exemption provided only to ministers results in preferential treatment for religious messages over secular ones.”

“Some might view a rule against preferential treatment as exhibiting hostility toward religion, but equality should never be mistaken for hostility,” Crabb opined. “It is important to remember that the Establishment Clause protects the religious and nonreligious alike.”

Crabb said if members of Congress believe there are reasons for granting the exemption, they can rewrite the law in a way that includes ministers as part of a larger group of beneficiaries, but as currently written the tax code “is unconstitutional.”

Brent Walker, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, said in a statement, “The ministerial housing allowance does not violate the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. Government violates the Establishment Clause when it gives religion a tangible benefit, such as grants to churches to finance their ministries or vouchers to parochial schools to pay for the teaching of religion.” 

Walker said the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment does not require such accommodation but also does not forbid it. While Section 107 of the tax code applies specifically to clergy, he said, other sections give similar relief to other segments of society including members of the military, taxpayers living abroad and employees required to live on premises or who are on 24-hour call.



Things You Need To Know


• The recent suit against the clergy housing exemption (see story, this page) was filed by the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation on grounds that the housing allowance violates the separation of church and state and the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. The group’s founders said if tax-exempt religious groups are allowed a housing subsidy, other tax-exempt groups, such as FFRF, should get one, too. 

• The exemption applies to an estimated 44,000 ministers, priests, rabbis, imams and others. Without it, some clergy could experience an estimated 5 to 10 percent cut in take-home pay.

• Churches routinely designate a portion of a pastor’s salary as a housing allowance. So, for example, a minister who earns an average of $50,000 may receive another third of income, or $16,000, as a tax-free housing allowance, essentially earning $66,000. Having to pay taxes on the additional $16,000 ($4,000 in this case), would mean a 6 percent cut in salary.

• The Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission and GuideStone Financial Resources plan to fight for the exemption.

• The exemption is worth about $700 million per year, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation’s Estimate of Federal Tax Expenditure. 

(Source: Religion News Service)

« back to previous page | return to top

Comment (0)

Be the first to post a comment.

Post your comment

Text size : A+ A- R
Powered by Google Translate
Full Member of Alabama Press Association

Site Developed by Dirextion | Login to SMS