Welcome to The Alabama Baptist

Other related sites for The Alabama Baptist

This option may be turned off in your profile page. If you are having
trouble with the link, make sure your pop-up blocker is turned off.

youtube

Register

Login

forgot password
 

RESOURCE CENTER AND ARCHIVES

Ethicists criticize treatment of brain-dead patients comments (4)

January 23, 2014


Many doctors are questioning continued medical procedures on a 13-year-old California girl declared brain-dead in early December 2013, calling interventions to provide nutrition to a dead body wrong and unethical.

Jahi McMath was pronounced dead by the coroner’s office after suffering rare complications from a Dec. 9 tonsillectomy. Her parents, unwilling to disconnect Jahi from machines that keep her heart beating artificially, have transferred her from an Oakland hospital to an unnamed facility. The McMath family lawyer announced Jan. 8 that Jahi’s new doctors had inserted a tube in her throat and another tube to provide nutrition to her stomach.

Many people don’t understand the differences between a coma, persistent vegetative state and brain death, said Arthur Caplan, head of the division of bioethics at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City. By moving the lungs up and down, a ventilator can “give the appearance of life,” Caplan said.

But in fact, “brain death” is no different than any other sort of death: A brain-dead person is no longer alive. The term simply describes how the death was determined.

According to the Uniform Determination of Death Act, adopted by most states, death is defined as “irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions” or “irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem.”

Some of the differences between states of consciousness and brain death are:

Brain death: These patients are no longer alive. There has been an irreversible cessation of all activity in both the brain and the brain stem. Reflexes that go through the spinal cord may persist even in a brain-dead state.

Coma: These patients are alive, but in a state of eyes-closed, depressed consciousness from which they cannot be aroused. Coma is distinguished from brain death by the presence of brain stem responses, spontaneous breathing or nonpurposeful motor responses. Coma has three possible outcomes: progression to brain death, recovery of consciousness or evolution to a state of chronically depressed consciousness, such as a vegetative state or minimally conscious state.

Vegetative state: Patients in vegetative states are alive but have severely impaired consciousness, although their eyes may open spontaneously. The eye opening may give the impression of consciousness, but there is no awareness of the environment. These patients do not acknowledge the examiner; they do not attend or track objects that are presented to them; their movements are nonpurposeful; they do not speak.

Minimally conscious state: These patients are alive, with a severe alteration in consciousness with intermittent but inconsistent behaviors suggesting awareness. Minimally conscious patients may occasionally have purposeful movements, and they may track motions with their eyes or speak.

Editor’s Note — Robert Stevens, associate professor of neuroscience/critical care at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, was a source for this story.

(RNS)

« back to previous page | return to top

Comments (4)

    Lynn 2/4/2014 8:05 AM

    I wonder if the 'medical ethicists' have ever discussed this subject with Zack Dunlap, Steven Thorpe, Gloria Cruz, or any of the other people who were declared 'brain dead' by experts, but are walking and talking today. These 'experts' insist that they didn't make a mistake: they followed the procedures in declaring these people 'brain dead'. Clearly we don't understand the brain as well as we think we do.

  • Diane 2/4/2014 12:12 PM

    Lynn, do you happen to have a link to the medical records of any of the people you mentioned. I would like to see some actual facts on these cases, what the doctors have in the notes and what tests were performed. Sensationalized news articles are the norm. I think it would be very beneficial to everyone if these records were released. From all of the scientific studies that I have read, there never once has been a person "recover" from brain death. There is a very good Japanese study out there. Jahi's brain and brain stem are dead and haven't received any blood flow or oxygen for nearly two months now. The brain is decomposing.

  • Gloria 2/4/2014 4:03 PM

    Zack Dunlap, Steven Thorpe, and Gloria Cruz were not pronounced brain dead. We've seen these names mentioned over and over, but the fact is, none of them was declared brain dead. Brain death is death, and is irreversible. There is no returning from it. Further, the family of Jahi McMath cannot demand a miracle of God. The Lord called his child home, but she does not come. God's will has been thwarted. This is evil and an abomination.

  • Kathleen 2/5/2014 9:58 AM

    I'm pretty sure those people had not started to decompose. Jahi has. Not surprising, as she's been dead for nearly two months.

Post your comment

 
 
Text size : A+ A- R
Powered by Google Translate
Full Member of Alabama Press Association


Site Developed by Dirextion | Login to SMS