Churches continue to have questions about IRS’ ‘church parking tax’

Churches continue to have questions about IRS’ ‘church parking tax’

An obscure provision in the 2017 tax overhaul bill continues to be of concern to churches and nonprofits who typically haven’t had to worry about filing a federal tax form.

The parking tax provision imposes a 21 percent tax on employee parking benefits provided by thousands of congregations and nonprofit organizations from coast to coast. Churches who provide parking and who determine they should pay the tax may have to file form 990-T paperwork with the IRS.

Many who have reviewed the interim guidance on the tax — contained in a 24-page document issued by the Treasury Department this past December — have determined that the new provision won’t affect their congregation.

“The good news: most churches will not face this tax. The bad news: some churches will,” according to a blog post by the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) of the Southern Baptist Convention.

Determining whether a church must pay the tax requires a fair amount of computations, outlined in the ERLC blog post.

The fact that houses of worship must make those calculations has upset leaders of national organizations — from the Jewish Federation of North America to the National Council of Nonprofits — that advocate for faith groups and charities.

Brian W. Walsh, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney and executive director of the Faith and Giving Coalition, said the tax sets a “terrible precedent.”

“When you tax the fringe benefits that churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of worship offer their employees, you’re taking money directly away from their ability to operate,” he said.

A for-profit company, said Walsh, can pass the cost of the tax on to customers. A church or other house of worship can’t do that.

“They can’t raise prices,” he said. “They typically operate on very slim margins. So it can be a huge impact financially.”

Beyond the financial cost, Walsh said he objects to the tax on principle.

“It really runs counter to basic American values about how we understand the proper relationship between the church and the state,” he said. “So that alone is a reason why this provision should be repealed.”

According to The Wall Street Journal, parking and transportation benefits were deductible for for-profit employers prior to the tax overhaul. When those deductions were eliminated, the rules for nonprofit employers were implemented to keep them from gaining an advantage in areas such as transportation costs and parking benefits.

A survey of more than 700 nonprofits found that the new tax on transportation fringe benefits will divert an average of about $12,000 per year from each charity’s mission, according to the Independent Sector.

“In many cases, they’ll probably pay more to accountants to figure this out than the actual amount of the tax,” Galen Carey, vice president of government relations for the National Association of Evangelicals, based in Washington, D.C., told RNS.

A simple way for many churches to avoid the tax might be to remove any “reserved” parking signs for church employees such as the pastor, since the calculation considers how many parking spaces are reserved for employees versus the general public.

If churches take down those signs by March 31 of this year, the IRS said that they won’t be subject to the tax provisions that went into effect on Jan. 1, 2018.

“So that’s a deadline fast approaching,” Carey said.

Churches subject to the tax were supposed to begin making quarterly payments last year, although the IRS guidance offered a temporary reprieve on penalties. The first form 990-T for those who must file it for calendar year 2018 is due by May 15 of this year.

More than 2,700 congregations and nonprofits signed a petition that the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability sent to Congress last year, calling for a full repeal of the little-known provision in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

So far, that repeal hasn’t happened.

“One of the confusing things about this new tax is that it is an income tax on expenses, not income,” said Dan Busby, president of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability, based in Virginia. “And it is a tax applied to tax-exempt organizations, including church, for providing parking to its employees that perform the tax-exempt functions of the organization.”

While some lawmakers have been willing to repeal the tax, others have demanded different changes in the corporate tax code as a condition for doing so, Busby said.

The federal government has projected that it will raise $1.7 billion from churches and charities over the next 10 years from the parking and commuter benefits tax, he added.

“Raising taxes to offset the repeal of this onerous provision is generally considered to be a nonstarter in the Senate,” Busby said. “ECFA continues to hope for repeal of the parking tax in the short term.” (RNS)